THE TEXAS COUNTY COMMENTARY


 SOME NEWS AND COMMENTS FOR CONSERVATIVE MISSOURIANS TO THINK ABOUT 

June 2007                                                                     Vol  11 Number 6

Published monthly since 1996 

NEWSLETTER
ARCHIVE

THE TEXAS COUNTY COMMENTARY

 SOME NEWS AND COMMENTS FOR CONSERVATIVE MISSOURIANS TO THINK ABOUT

 Published monthly since 1996                                             June 2007                                                           Vol 11  Number 6

The Next Meeting of Texas County Republicans will be Tuesday, June 26, 2007 at the Lion’s Den north of Houston on US 63 starting at 7PM. The meeting will be preceded by a pot luck supper at 6PM.

 

The Next Meeting of Texas County Republican Women will be at noon, Saturday, June 9, 2007 at Fratello’s Pizza in Houston (East side of the intersection where Hwy 17 comes in from Ft. Wood) They will honor county winners of No Child Left Behind. Ron Reed will be the speaker and Debbie James, the hostess.

 

The Missouri Supreme Court issued a decision last month that parents must be informed of their children’s decision to end an innocent life. Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers will no longer be able to aid or assist minors in obtaining an abortion without parental consent. (Governor’s News Release)

 

Taxes and Economy The Missouri Office of Administration reports that through April 30 the state had received $4.48 billion in individual income tax collections. This is an increase of $300 million or 6.7 percent compared to the same period in 2006. Tax refunds also increased by $37.4 million or 3.9 percent. The same report states that recent data demonstrates a marked slow-down in the economy due to reduced residential construction. Despite this, overall employment continues to expand and consumers continue to spend although energy prices are taking their toll. The outlook for the state is a return to moderate growth.

 

Work of the State Legislature, in the session just concluded includes passing (1) the Senior Tax Justice Act to stop taxing seniors’ Social Security benefits. Unfortunately, to get Senate approval required phasing the tax cut over six years. (2) The Castle Doctrine of Missouri allows law-abiding citizens to use deadly force to protect their home and family and not punish them; (3) allowing voters to amend the constitution and make English the official language of Missouri; and (4) providing a budget that improves essential services, like schools, without raising taxes or wasting the budget surplus. It even leaves in $200 million unspent setting it aside in case there is a downturn in the economy. (Capitol Report by Speaker Rod Jetton)

 

Washington, Missouri is one of the inaugural cities in the Downtown Revitalization and Economic Assistance for Missouri (DREAM) initiatives. Governor Blunt announced that the Bank of Washington has been approved to receive $43,708 in Brownfield Redevelopment tax credits to help create 45 new jobs and retain 55 with an estimated payroll of $1.8 million. In 2006 Missouri cities were invited to apply for DREAM financial incentives. (Governor’s News Release)

 

The Small Business Administration has approved Governor Blunt’s request for low-interest economic impact loans to affected businesses in 22 Missouri counties as a result of the January 12-22, 2007 winter storms. Texas County is included in the list of affected counties. (Governor Blunt’s  E-News)

 

AT&T has Announced it will invest $335 million to expand new television and high-speed internet services in Missouri. Just two months ago Governor Blunt signed legislation to change the way telecommunication companies gain access to Missouri markets.  The expansion will include bringing DSL (digital subscriber lines) to rural areas where this computer service is not currently available. (MO Digital News)

 

The Individual Right to Bear Arms as guaranteed by the Bill of Rights may finally be confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Six District of Columbia residents brought suit because they wanted functional fire arms in their homes for self-defense. The U.S. Court of Appeals in D.C. Circuit struck down the 31-year gun ban in the Capital. No one argued what the Second Amendment mean in 1791. But some today claim, it does not apply to individuals but to a collective right of the states to have a National Guard. (Townhall.com)

 

Fred Thompson (Former Senator and possible presidential candidate) predicts the immigration reform bill worked out late last month will fail. “The bill will not win the support of the American people because they don’t trust the senators’ promises to block illegal immigrants from crossing the border. It goes to the bigger issue of the lack of credibility our government has these days. The military and economic threat that China poses is among the critical issues, along with untamed growth in entitlement spending, that is not being dealt with while the U.S. is fixated on the war in Iraq. It’s not a pretty picture  (The Jackson Sun)

 

You will always find time for that which you place first.

 

Page Two, June 2007

 

Muzzling the Critics In a directive issued April 19 the U.S. Army has ordered soldiers to stop sending personal e-mail messages and posting blogs without first clearing the content with a superior officer. Blogs allow a greater amount of two-way communication between the public and soldiers in the field. The crack-down isn’t about operational security; it’s about preventing Senator Harry Reid from being criticized by soldiers. As the directive is written the soldiers’ commanders would have to review/censor every e-mail they want to send or be subject to military courts martial or disciplinary action. As this is impractical commanders would have to forbid soldiers from using e-mail. (WiredNews.com)

 

A Republican Congress in 2008?  A sixteen seat gain would restore a Republican majority in the House.  This is quite possible as 61 Democrats were elected in districts that Bush carried in 2004. Looking at history, we find that in the 1958 mid-term elections the GOP lost 48 seats but two years later they gained 21 seats in 1960 when Kennedy was elected president. (TownHall.com)

 

The President’s Approval Rating remains high among those who voted for him, with 66 percent approving the way Mr. Bush is doing his job. Only 21 percent disapprove and 13 percent are unsure. (New York Times)

 

“Gingrich Should Not Enter the Presidential Race because he is doing fine in his present role because there aren’t a lot of thoughtful politicians like him. Gingrich is a great “visionary” but not an effective leader when it comes to managing and directing the whole offense.” (Marvin Olasky, editor in chief, WORLD Magazine)

 

The U.S. is Not Alone Canada’s Environmental Minister, John Baird recently said Kyoto compliance would cost Canada 275,000 jobs and push the economy into recession. Instead, Canada will join the U.S-led Asian-Pacific Partnership whose members include Australia, China, India, Japan and South Korea. China, it is estimated, will soon surpass the United States as the leading emitter of greenhouse gases. Yet, last month the Chinese government said that while they will participate in negotiations to shape a post-Kyoto treaty limiting greenhouse gases, they would not commit to binding reductions of CO2. (National Center for Policy Analysis)

 

Political Strategists close to Al Gore have secretly begin assembling a campaign team to prepare for a new run for the White House by the former vice president. Two members of Gore’s staff from his campaign of 2000 have been approached about working for Gore if he decides to run according to Britain’s Sunday Telegraph. One of Gore’s former campaign workers was asked if he would be available toward the end of the year.  A new book that Gore is publishing in May, “Assault on Reason,” will likely keep his name in the public eye, as did his global warming documentary “An Inconvenient Truth.” (NewsMax.com)

 

Quote of the Month (By Jay Leno) “With hurricanes, tornados, fires out of control, mud slides, flooding, severe thunderstorms tearing up the country from one end to the another, and the threat of bird flue and terrorist attacks, are we sure this is a good time to take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance.”

____________________________________________________________________________________

 

Fred Thompson, undeclared candidate?

An Excerpt of his remarks at the Lincoln Day Dinner in Orange County, California.

 

So we meet again, and I’m honored, because I know we’re here for the same reasons: love of our country and concern for our future.

 

A lot of Americans have these concerns tonight. They are concerned about the way things are going in our country right now. Some fear we may be in the first stages of decline. We’ve heard this malaise talk before.

 

Of course, Iraq is a large part of it. Not only is it tough going, but the effort is besieged on all sides. From those playing the most crass kind of politics with it at home to criticism from around the world.

 

Even at home, as we enjoy the benefits from one of the best economies we’ve ever had, people seem uncertain; they raise concerns about global competition or a growing economic disparity among our citizens.

(Continued on Page Three)

 

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority it is time to pause and reflect. (Mark Twain)

 

 

 

Fred Thompson (Continued from Page Two)                                                                                  Page Three, June 2007    

 

These are challenges. But how we react to them is more important than the challenges themselves. Some want us, to the extent possible, to withdraw from the world that presents us with so many problems, in hope they will go away. Some would push us toward protectionist trade policies. Others see a solution in raising taxes and redistributing the income among our citizens.

 

Wrong on all accounts. These are defensive, defeatist policies that have consistently proven wrong. They are not what America is all about.

 

Let’s talk about the issues here at home first. A lot of folks in Washington suffer from a big misconception about our economy. They confuse the well-being of our government with the wealth of our nation. Adam Smith pointed out the same problem in his day, when many governments mixed up how much money the king had with how well-off the country was.

 

Taxes are necessary. But they don’t make the country any better off. At best they simply move money from the private sector to the government. But, taxes are also a burden on production, because they discourage people from working, saving, investing, and taking risks. Some economists have calculated that today each additional dollar collected by the government, by raising income tax rates, makes the private sector as much as two dollars worse off.

 

To me this means one simple thing: tax rates should be as low as possible. This isn’t anything ideological, and it isn’t some great insight. It’s common sense arithmetic.

 

That’s why the economy booms when taxes are cut. When the Kennedy tax cuts were passed in the 1960’s, the economy boomed. When Reagan cut taxes in 1981, we went from economic malaise to a new morning in America. And when George Bush cut taxes in 2001, he took a declining economy he inherited to an economic expansion…despite 9-11, the NASDAQ bubble and corporate scandals.

 

The Democrats, of course, want to raise taxes. They want to target the rich, they say. A word of advice to anyone in the middle class…don’t stand anywhere near that target. Wouldn’t it be great if, instead of worrying so much about how to divide the pie, we could work together on how to make the pie bigger?

 

On globalization….we’re not afraid of it. It works to our benefit. We innovate more and invest in that innovation better than anywhere else in the world. Same goes for services, which are increasingly driving our economy. Free trade and market economies have done more for freedom and prosperity than a central planner could ever dream and we’re the world’s best example of that. So why do we want to take investment dollars out of growth and invest it in government.

 

I’d say cash flow to the government is already going quite well. Over the past year our current tax structure generated record levels of revenue for Washington. In fact it’s time to seriously consider what we’re getting for our “investment” in government.

 

For many years, several functions of the federal government have been descending into a sorry state of mis-management and lack of accountability. I published a 68-page report on government waste, duplication and inability to carry out some of its basic responsibilities. That was back on 2001 before 9-11, and it got little attention. Now government shortcomings are affecting national security and are getting a lot of attention.

 

The growth of government is not solving these problems; it’s causing a lot of them. Every level of new bureaucracy that is created develops a level of bureaucracy beneath it, which creates another one. Pretty soon there is no accountability in the system. A new head of a department or agency comes in from out of town and after a protracted confirmation fight, wants to spend his or her few years in Washington making great policy and solving national problems, not fighting with their own bureaucrats. So they just let well enough alone. Then you start seeing the results….departments that can’t pass an audit, computer systems that don’t work, intelligence breakdowns, people in over their heads. (Continued on Page Four)

 

You can balance the budget by robbing the people, but you’ll find you have torpedoed the economy (Pres. Reagan, 12/17/81)

 

 

 

 

 

Page Four, June 2007       Fred Thompson (Continued from Page Three)

 

Yet, people in both parties continue trying to federalize and regulate at the national level ever more aspects of American society….things that have traditionally been handled at the state and local level. We   must remember that states serve as laboratories for innovation. That’s how we got welfare reform. Our system also allows for diversity in our large country. Our attitude should be, let the federal government do what it is supposed to be doing…competently. Then maybe we will give it something else to do.

 

The government could start by securing our nation’s borders. A sovereign nation that can’t do that is not a sovereign nation. This is secondarily an immigration issue. It’s primarily a national security issue. We were told twenty years ago if we produced a comprehensive solution, we’d solve the illegal immigration problem. Twelve million illegals later, we’re told that same thing again. I don’t believe most Americans are as concerned about the 12 million that are here as they are about the next 12 million and the next 12 million after that. I think they are thinking: “Prove you can secure the border and then people of good will can sit down and work out the rest of it, while protecting those folks who play by the rules.”

 

Speaking of reforms and our economy, there is nothing more urgent than the fate that is awaiting the Social Security and Medicare programs. The good news is that we are living longer. However, we don’t have enough young people working to finance these programs from their taxes.

 

People say the programs are going bankrupt. They won’t go bankrupt. Even as these programs sap every dime of the government’s revenue, the folks in Washington will raise the taxes necessary to cover the problem. At this rate the federal government is going to wind up as nothing more than a transfer agent….

transferring wealth from one generation to another. It will devastate our economy.

 

Sometimes I think I am the last guy around who thinks term limits is a good idea. The professionalization of politics saps people’s courage. Their desire to keep their job and not upset anybody overrides all else, even if it hurts the country

 

So the entitlement problem gets kicked a little further down the road. This action is based on the premise that our generation is too greedy to help the next generation. I believe that just the opposite is true. If grandmom and granddad think that a little sacrifice will help the grandchildren when they get married, try to buy a home or have children, they will respond to a credible call to make the sacrifice…if they don’t think that the sacrifice is going down some government black hole.

 

I am going to quote my friend, Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. I don’t think he’ll mind, even though it was a private conversation. He said: “People talk a lot about moral issues, but the greatest moral issue facing our generation is the fact that we are bankrupting the next generation. People talk about wanting to make a difference. Here we could make a difference for generations to come.”

 

It is clear, that with close numbers in the House and Senate we need bipartisanship to have any chance for real reform in any of these areas. And there are many responsible people who are willing to try to make it happen. But the level of bipartisanship needed for real progress can only be achieved when politicians perceive that the American people are demanding it. That’s why leaders of reform and hopefully our next President, will have a mandate to go directly to the American people with truth and clarity.

 

Today in Washington, there’s lot of talk about the need for conversation…that we should talk to our nation’s enemies, that we should speak “truth to power.” But, the speakers are usually turned in the wrong direction. Instead of talking to each other, leaders need to be speaking more to the American people.

 

The message would be simple: “My friends we have entered a new era. We are going to be tested in many ways, possibly under attack for a long time. It’s time to take stock and be honest with ourselves. We’re going to have to do a lot of things better. Here’s what we need to do and here’s why. And now that you’re being called upon, I know you will do whatever is necessary for the sake of our country. You always have.”

 

When the American people respond to that, as I know they will, you will have your bipartisanship.               

 

Democracy is good. I say this because other systems are worse. (Jawharal Nehru)

 

 

 

Page Five, June 2007

 

What is Happening in Our World? Part 3

The third and concluding article of the series by Herbert Meyer.

 

The author served during the Reagan administration as special assistant to the Director of Central Intelligence and Vice Chairman of the CIA’s National Intelligence Council and was first to predict the USSR’s collapse. Last month’s article addressed issues in (1) Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan, (2) China, and (3) nations with populations that are shrinking. Now the fourth issue:

 

“4.  Restructuring of American Business  The restructuring of American business means we are coming to the end of the age of the employer and employee. With all this fracturing of business into different and smaller units, employers can’t guarantee jobs anymore because they don’t know what their companies will look like next year. The new workforce contract will be, “show up at my office five days a week and do what I want you to do, but handle your own insurance benefits, health care and everything else.”

 

Husbands and wives are becoming economic units. They take different jobs and work different shifts depending on where they are in their careers and families. They make tradeoffs to put together a compensation package to take care of the family. This used to happen only with highly educated professionals with high income. Now it is happening at the level of the factory worker. Couples at all levels are designing their compensation packages based on individual needs. The only way this can work is if everything is portable and flexible, which requires a huge shift in the American economy.

 

The U.S. is in the process of building the world’s first 21st century model economy. The only other countries doing this are the U.K. and Australia. The model is fast, flexible, highly productive and unstable in that it is always fracturing and re-fracturing. This will increase the economic gap between the U.S. and everybody else, especially Europe and Japan. At the same time, the military gap is increasing. Other than China, we are the only country that is continuing to put money into their military.

 

Plus, we are the only military getting on-the-ground experience through our war in Iraq. We know which high-tech weapons are working and which ones are not. There is almost no one who can take us on economically or militarily. There has never been a superpower in this position before.

 

On the one hand, this makes the U.S. a magnet for bright and ambitious people. It also makes us a target. We are one of the last holdouts of the traditional Judeo-Christian culture. There is no better place in the world to be in business and raise children. The U.S. is by far the best place to have an idea, form a business and put it in the marketplace. We take it for granted, but it isn’t available in other countries of the world.

 

Ultimately, it’s an issue of culture. The only people who can hurt us are ourselves, by losing our culture. If we give up the Judeo-Christian culture, we become just like the Europeans. The culture war is the whole ball game. If we lose it, there isn’t another American to pull us out.”

__________________________________________________________________________________________

 

The following are quotations from “Why I am a Reagan Conservative,” by Michael K. Deaver

 

“The left desires people to be virtuous. And to be fair, the leftists desire to be virtuous themselves.  Unfortunately, they covet virtue so much that they take moral shortcuts to achieve it. In left-wing life, as in left-wing legislation, easy words are given the credit for difficult deeds. The mere declaration of “War on Poverty” was enough to give the great society heroes their triumph and victory parade. When a Reagan   conservative says that someone “means well,” it is hardly a compliment.”    P.J. O’Rourke

 

Conservatism is a direction, not a destination. It is a constant effort to protect the ideals that make our nation the greatest on earth.  Darrell Issa, (R-CA) 

 

 

Egotist:  Someone who is usually me-deep in conversation.

 

 

 

Page Six, June 2007

Global Warming Swindle

By Thomas Sowell, as seen at Townhall.com

 

Britain’s Channel 4 has produced a devastating documentary titled ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle.’ It has apparently not been broadcast by any of the networks in the United States.

 

Distinguished scientists specializing in climate and climate-related fields talk in plain English and present readily understood graphs showing what a crock the current global warming hysteria is. These include scientists from MIT and top-tier universities in a number of countries. Some of these scientists whose names were paraded on some of the global warming publications that are being promoted by the media state plainly that they neither wrote those publications nor approved them. One scientist threatened to sue unless his name was removed.

 

While the public has been led to believe that “all” the leading scientists buy the global warming hysteria and the political agenda that goes with it. In fact, the official reports from the United Nations or the National Academy of Sciences are written by bureaucrats….and then garnished with the names of the leading scientists who were ‘consulted,’ but whose contrary conclusions were ignored.

 

There is no question that the globe is warming but has warmed and cooled before, and is not as warm today as it was some centuries ago, before there were any automobiles and before there was as much burning of fossil fuels as today. None of the dire things predicted today happened then.

 

The British documentary goes into some of the many factors that have caused the earth to warm and cool for centuries, including changes in activities on the sun, 93 million miles away and wholly beyond the jurisdiction of the Kyoto treaty.

 

According to these climate scientists, human activities have very little effect on the climate, compared to many other factors, from volcanoes to clouds. These scientists debunk the mathematics that were used to hype global warming hysteria, even though hard evidence stretching back for centuries contradict them.

 

What is even scarier than seeing how easily the public, the media and the politicians have been manipulated and stampeded, is discovering how much effort has been put into silencing scientists who dare to say the emperor has no clothes. Academics who jump on the global warming bandwagon are far more likely to get big research grants than those who express doubts….and research is the lifeblood of an academic career at leading universities.

 

Environmental movements around the world are committed to global warming hysteria and nowhere more so than on college campuses, where they can harass those who say otherwise. One of the scientists interviewed on the British documentary reported getting death threats.

 

In politics, even conservative Republicans seem to have taken the view that, if you can’t lick ‘em, join ‘em; so have big corporations which have joined the stampede. This only enables the green crusaders at every opportunity to say that ‘everybody’ believes the global warming scenario, except for a scattered few ‘deniers’ who are likened to holocaust deniers.

 

The difference is that we have the hardest and most painful evidence that there was a holocaust. But, the global warming scenario that is causing such hysteria, we have only a movie made by a politician and mathematical models whose results change drastically when you change a few of the arbitrarily selected variables.

 

No one denies that temperatures are about one degree warmer than they were a century ago. What the climate scientists in the British documentary deny is that you can mindlessly extrapolate that we are headed for a climate catastrophe if we don’t take drastic steps that could cause an economic catastrophe.”

 

Send comments and subscriptions to THE COMMENTARY, PO Box 126, Mountain Grove, MO 65711. Subscriptions by mail are  $10 per year. It is free on line at www.texascountyrepublicans.org or free as an e-mail if requested.  Lee Hutcheson Editor.

The Texas County Commentary is a publication of the Texas County Republican Committee, Kevin McGowen, Chairman

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

Send comments and subscriptions to THE COMMENTARY, PO Box 126, Mountain Grove, MO 65711. Subscriptions by mail are $10 per year.

 It is free on line at www.texascountyrepublicans.org or free as an e-mail if requested. Lee Hutcheson, Editor.

The Texas County y is a publication of the Texas County Republican Committee, Kevin, McGowen, Chairman

 

 


  Click here to return to the Texas County Republican Home Page