SOME NEWS AND COMMENTS FOR CONSERVATIVE MISSOURIANS TO THINK ABOUT
February 2007 Vol 11 Number 2
The Next
Meeting of Texas County Republicans will
be TUESDAY February 27 at the Lions’ Club on US63 north of
The Next
Meeting of Republican Women will
be
at
QUESTION? Have
you paid your 2007 dues as a member of the Texas County Republicans? Be
a
participant and write a check ($10 per person) to Texas County
Republicans and
mail it to Ray Smith, Treasurer,
NOTICE: It was announced at the last meeting that
the $7
charged for a one year subscription to this newsletter does not quite
cover the
cost of printing and mailing. And as postage will increase in April, it
was
decided to take two actions. First, although the “Commentary” will
continue to
be available on the Texas County Republican website, we will e-mail the
letter directly
to each person who gives us an e-mail address. There will be no cost
for this
and each person can print his own copy. For those who cannot receive
e-mail the
cost per subscription is increased to $10 per year. Those
who want to automatically receive “The
Commentary” by e-mail please send your e-mail address to Lee and Joyce
Hutcheson at ljhutch@fidnet.com.
Mark Your
Calendar The
annual Lincoln Day Dinner will be held
Governor Blunt has Announced that “Utilicare” is being funded with $6.3 million to assist over 12,000 low-income families with their heating expenses this winter. The Public Service Commission estimates that the average five month winter cost for Missourians to heat their homes with natural gas will exceed $800. For more information contact the Local Community Action Agencies. (Governor Blunt news release)
In the State of the State Address the governor proposed a new health care system, MOHealthNet, to replace the old Medicaid system. The proposal recognizes that Missourians should all have one central point of contact and a doctor who knows them personally. It empowers participants to choose their health care home and to develop a plan of care for improved health and avoid unnecessary emergency room visits. The most vulnerable participants will have access to the Chronic Care Improvement Program recognizing that some people need more care than others. MOHealthNet will expand the number of participants who are allowed to choose their own health plan or purchase health insurance. (Governor’s News Release)
The Internet
Cyber Crime Grant Program has
been
awarded more than $242,000 to support law enforcement in investigating
Internet
crimes, including those that endanger
The Missouri
National Guard (MONG) had
more than
500 soldiers on duty performing various missions in the area struck by
the
storm last month. It included transporting generators and going door to
door in
some areas. The Missouri State Water Patrol assisted with health and
welfare in
President
Bush Granted Governor Blunt’s Request that
34 counties be declared a major disaster following the ice storms that
swept
across
He who laughs last thinks slowest
It’s
Getting Crowded There are
eight
Democrats who want to be President, namely: Senators Hillary Clinton, (NY),
John Edwards, (NC), Mike Gravel (AK),
Barack Obama, (IL) and Chris Dodd (CT) plus Governor Bill Richardson of New
Mexico, former Governor Tom
Vilsack of Iowa and Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich. Among
the Republicans there are Senators John McCain (AZ), and Sam Brownback (KS), former
Governors Mitt Romney (MA) and
Mike
Huckabee (AR), and
Congressman Duncan
Hunter (CA). Not included are
George
Allen (who shot himself in the foot with a casual remark about Indians)
and
Rudy Giuliani, former mayor of
The
Right to Life Act has been
re-introduced by Duncan Hunter, U.S. Representative from
Despite
the Chaos in Iraq the
birthrate has
increased since the
To Understand why the Founders put War Powers in the hands of the presidency, consider the resolution pushed through the Senate Foreign Relations Committee late last month by Joe Biden (D-DE) and Chuck Hagel (R-NE), two men who would love to be President if only they could persuade enough voters to elect them. Both men voted for the Iraq War. But, with that war proving to be more difficult than they thought, they now want to put themselves on record as opposing any further attempts to win it. Their resolution, calls for Iraqis to “reach a political settlement leading to “reconciliation,” as if anyone disagrees with that necessity. Their logic seems to be that if Americans leave, Iraqis will miraculously conclude they must settle their differences. (from The Wall Street Journal editorial page)
Think
About It: 40 percent of all workers in
Barack Hussein Obama was born in
Banks Scramble to Curb Foreclosures As mortgage delinquencies rise to levels not seen in five years, banks are reaching out to borrowers and help stem the tide of defaults. The popularity of adjustable rate mortgages as a way to finance more homes has put homeowners in hot water. To avoid massive defaults, lenders are offering free refinancing and forgiving debt when a home is sold at a loss. (NewsMax.com)
<>You are never too old
to grow younger. (Mae West)
A Spending Sham
A recent article from The Wall
Street Journal Editorial Page by Pete DuPont
A
fresh new Congress has come to
But,
the most important goal of the new Democratic congressional majority is
establishing a liberal national economic policy: bigger government and
higher
taxes. Spend more even than the Republicans have been spending (an
annual 7.2%
increase during the Bush years), and raise rather than lower tax rates.
Making
sure that the Bush tax cuts expire in 2010 is the Democrats’ most
important
policy, and easy to accomplish since their expiration is automatic
unless the
law is changed. That will raise low-income tax rates to 15% from 10%
and high
income tax rates to 39.6% from 35%, and… if you assume higher taxes
don’t
depress the economic growth, it will generate about $88 billion in
annual tax
receipts by the end of the decade. And it the Congress allows the death
tax to
be reinstated (its phase-out expires in 2010 too), they will gain
another $28
billion each year. For big government advocates, this is real progress.
But
a new Congress supportive of increased spending cannot be supportive of
increased deficits, so the Democratic House majority reinstated a
clever and
deceptive wrinkle, something called pay-as-you-go, or “Paygo.” It
specifies
that any revenue loss as a result of tax cuts, or any newly enacted
entitlements, or other spending increases, must be paid for by other
spending
reductions or tax increases. (House rules require a three-fifths vote
for tax
increases, but Democrats made sure that requirement can be waived by a
simple
majority vote.)
Thus,
the Democrats’ plan to reduce the interest rates on some student loans
by half,
to 3.4% from 6.8%, which would cost about $6 billion over five years,
would
have to be covered by other spending cuts or tax increases.
Senator
Tom Harkin of
And
the
It
all sounds good, very fiscally responsible, but paygo is riddled with
deceptions. It does not cover increases and Medicare’s 14% (which
includes
Bush’s senior citizens’ drug program) spending increase plus spending
increases
in existing entitlement programs. So, for example, this year’s 4.7%
Medicaid
spending will be unfunded and health care spending will continue to
grow
unabated.
“Emergency”
expenditures are not covered by paygo either; they averaged $22 billion
a year
in the 1990s, and are $100 billion a year now.
(Continued on the following page)
There is no amount of
money Congress cannot outspend (Thomas Sowell)
And
the new House paygo rule contains a blockbuster of loopholes: The House
can pay
for short-term spending increases by promising long term spending cuts.
Paygo
requires setting spending amounts for the current fiscal year and five
or ten
years from now. So Congress presumably can add another $50 billion to
next
year’s spending and comply with paygo by promising to reduce spending
by that
amount in 2017.
The
truth of the matter is that paygo is a pipedream, a spending sham.
Neither the
Democratic nor the Republican establishment wants it to apply to any
appropriation bills or spending program increases, for linking spending
increase to a tax increase is a tough sell.
The
Heritage Foundation’s new study “The 100 Hour Agenda: The New
Congressional
Majority’s Uneven Proposals” reports that in the dozen years (1990
-2002) that
the old paygo rules were in effect, Congress “repeatedly passed
legislation
that prevented the OMB (Office of Management and Budget) from enforcing
paygo
at all,” and in those years “97 percent of all mandatory spending…all
but $31
billion…had been statutorily exempted from any paygo sequestration.”
But
of course tax cuts are a different matter, and that is the point of the
Democratic paygo plan. The liberal Democratic majority (and those 48
Republican
Congressmen who voted with them) will make sure it never applies to
spending
increases and always apples to tax cuts, so that taxes can never be
reduced,
spending can always be increased, and big government liberalism will be
restored to its 1960s prominence.
(Mr. DuPont
is chairman of the Dallas-based
A Story the News Media Ignores
NASCO, North America’s Super Corridor Coalition,
Inc., is a
non-profit organization dedicated to developing the world’s first
international, integrated and secure multi-modal transportation system
along
the Mid-Continent Trade and Transportation Corridor to improve both the
trade
competitiveness and quality of life in
NASCO
is not a government agency. It has no authority to build or develop
anything
unilaterally. NASCO works with its members, state Departments of
Transportation
and federal and local agencies involved in transportation, trade and
security
to accomplish its mission.
The
NASCO Corridor encompasses Interstate Highways 35, 29 and 94, and the
significant east/west connectors to those highways in the
From
the largest border crossing in North America (The Ambassador Bridge in
Detroit,
Michigan and Windsor, Canada), to the second largest border crossing of
NAIPN (The North American Inland Port Network) a
sub-committee of NASCO, has
been tasked with developing an active inland port network along the
corridor to
specifically alleviate congestion at maritime ports and our nations
borders.
The NAIPN envisions a network of inland ports specializing in the
transpor-
tation of containerized cargo in
You may
not be the master of your destiny, but you control a great amount of
what
happens to you.
NASCO
has received $2.25 million in Congressional funding to be
administered by the United States Department of Transportation (DOT)
for the
development of a technology integration and tracking project. The
project will
use members of NASCO as the primary participants in the project, to the
extent
possible. NASCO believes a modern information system will reduce the
cost and
improve efficiency, reduce trade- related congestion and enhance
security of cross
border information, trade and traffic.
The
Security and Prosperity Partnership of
Ethanol
and
its Consequences
From
The Wall Street Journal,
Editorial Page,
President
Bush made a big push for alternative fuels in his State of the
Union speech last month, calling for Americans to reduce gasoline
consumption
by 20% over 10 years. On the following day he set out to tour a DuPont
facility
in
Cellulose
ethanol, which is derived from plants like switchgrass, will
require a big technological break-through to have any impact on the
fuel
supply. That leaves corn, and sugar based ethanol, which have been
around long
enough to understand their significant limitations. What we have here
is a
classic stampede rooted more in hope and self-interest than science or
logic.
Ostensibly,
the great virtue of ethanol is that it represents a
“sustainable” environmentally friendly source of energy, a source that
is
literally homegrown rather than imported from unstable places like
The
Milken Institute Review state that federal and state subsidies for
ethanol ran to about $6 billion last year. That’s
roughly half of the wholesale market
price. Ethanol gets a 51-cent a gallon domestic subsidy, and there’s
another
54-cent a gallon tariff applied at the border against imported ethanol.
Without
those subsidies, hardly anyone would make the stuff, much less buy it,
despite
the recent high oil prices.
That’s
why the percentage of the
As
for the environmental impact, where do we begin? Ethanol increases the
level of
nitrous oxides in the atmosphere and thus causes smog. The scientific
literature is also divided about whether the energy inputs required to
produce
ethanol actually exceed its energy output. It takes fertilizer to grow
the
corn, and fuel to ship and process it, and so forth. Even the most
optimistic
estimate says ethanol’s net output is a marginal improvement of only
1.3 to
one. For purposes of comparison, energy outputs from gasoline exceed
inputs by
an estimated 10 to one.
And
because corn-based ethanol is less efficient than ordinary gasoline,
using it
to fuel cars means you need more gas to drive the same number of miles.
This is
not exactly a route to “independence” from the Mideast,
In
the U.S., there is now talk of taking the roughly 40 million acres
currently
tied up in the Agriculture Department’s conservation reserve and
security
programs and putting them into production for ethanol-
related
plants. “The land at risk under this ethanol program is land that’s
shown by
the USDA to have had great results for the restoration of wildlife,”
pointing
especially to the grasslands of eastern
But
what about global warming, where ethanol, as a non-fossil fuel, is
supposed to
make a positive contribution? Actually, it barely makes a dent.
Australian
researcher Robert Niven finds that the use of ethanol in gasoline, the
standard
way in which ethanol is currently used, reduces greenhouse gases by no
more
than 5%. Employing ethanol to reduce
greenhouse gases is fantastically inefficient.
It
is true that scientific advances will probably improve and may even
transform
the utility of ethanol. Genetic modification will likely improve corn
yields.
And the President insists we are on the verge of breakthroughs in
cellulose
technology, although experts tell us the technical hurdles are still
huge. We’d
be as happy as anyone if DuPont researchers finally discover the enzyme
that
can efficiently break down plants into starch, but betting billions of
tax
dollars and million of acres of farmland on this hope strikes us as bad
policy.
None
of these facts are likely to make much difference in the current
So
here comes Big Corn. Make that Very Very Big Corn. Sooner or later, our
experience with this huge public gamble may make us years for the
efficiency,
capacity and lower cost of “Big Oil.”
___________________________________________________________________________________
Cherokee
Wisdom
One evening
an old Cherokee told his grandson about a battle that goes on inside
people. He
said, “My son, the battle is between two ‘wolves’ inside us all. One
is Evil
It is angry, envy, jealousy, sorrow
regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority,
lies,
false pride, superiority and ego. The Other is Good It is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity,
humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, truth, generosity, compassion
and
faith.” The grandson thought for a minute, then asked, “Grandpa, which
wolf
wins?” The old Cherokee replied, “The
one you feed.”
Send comments and
subscriptions to THE COMMENTARY,
Subscriptions by
mail are $7
per year or free on line at www.texascountyrepublicans.org,
Lee Hutcheson, Editor
The Texas County
Commentary
is a publication of the Texas County Republican Party, Kevin D.
McGowen,
Chairman
Click
here to return to the Texas County Republican Home Page