THE TEXAS COUNTY COMMENTARY


 SOME NEWS AND COMMENTS FOR CONSERVATIVE MISSOURIANS TO THINK ABOUT 

January 2008                                                                   Vol  1  Number 11

Published monthly since 1996 

NEWSLETTER
ARCHIVE


HERE’S WISHING A HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL The Next Meeting of Texas County Republicans will be 7 P.M. Tuesday, January 22, 2008 at the Lions Den on U.S. 63 north of Houston. The meeting will be preceded by a pot luck supper at 6PM.

 

The Next Meeting of the Texas County Federation of Republican Women will start at noon, Saturday, January 12 at El Imperial restaurant on main street in downtown Cabool. Hostesses will be Wanda Barr and Carol Jean Whetstine.

 

“Enforcing Immigration Laws should be primarily federal responsibility, but Washington has failed to act which means Missouri must make up for that failure and protect Missouri against illegal immigration,” Governor Blunt said when he announced additional steps in his plan to stop  illegal immigration. He said: “With the support of Missouri’s General Assembly we will enact some of the nation’s toughest laws to fight illegal immigration.” The governor’s plan would ban the creation of sanctuary cities, require all employers to use a legal worker verification system, impose new monetary sanctions against contractors and criminalize the transportation of illegals. Information about the E-Verify program can be seen at www.dhs.gov/E-Verify

Additionally, Governor Blunt has called for legislation to prevent illegals from obtaining driver’s licenses.

 

50 First Responder Agencies in Missouri will receive new equipment through the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Commercial Equipment Direct Assistance Program totaling $838,166. Last year 45 First responders in Missouri received equipment under the program. The Raymondville Volunteer Fire Department is one of this year’s 50 and is scheduled to receive $30,935. (Governor Blunt’s News Release)

 

The Missouri State Tax Commission was thanked by Governor Blunt for heeding his call to stop a large tax increase based on their scheduled review of agricultural land values. The Commission voted 2-1 against the proposal. The State Tax Commission makes recommendations to the General Assembly regarding agricultural land production values which determined values for property tax assessment purposes. By statute land used for farming is taxed by its production value and not its market value. (Gov. News Release)

 

A Comprehensive Higher Education funding plan has been announced by Governor Blunt. He is recommending a total of $100 million in needs-based scholarships for Missouri students. When combined with the past increases the needs-based scholarships through the Access Missouri Scholarship program have increased 400 percent since Governor Blunt took office. The program has one simple formula based on the family’s ability to pay for college. It provides assistance to all our colleges and universities. Last year 16,400 students received needs-based scholarships (Governor Blunt’s News Release)

 

Governor Blunt calls for the Death Penalty to be included in state law as punishment for the worst sexual predators. Earlier this year the governor announced his support for a new initiative to strengthen Missouri’s sex offender registry even further by requiring convicted sex offenders to submit their e-mail addresses and other electronic identifiers to the sex offender registry. (Governor Blunt’s New Release).

 

Washington’s Inaction Could Delay Tax Refunds to middle income Missourians who file their tax return electronically. The IRS has indicated that without action from Congress it will not be able to process electronic tax returns until eat least February 18 and will have no choice but to insist on paper returns. And the change to paper returns will double the time to process the paperwork. The governor has urged Missouri’s members of Congress to resole the matter as quickly as possible. (Governor’s News Release)

 

Rasmussen Reports December polling in Missouri shows Huckabee with 45 percent over Sen. Clinton with 43 percent. In October Giuliani had a slight lead over Clinton. Huckabee is viewed favorably by 53 percent of Missouri voters, Obama favorable by 52 percent, Clinton by 51 percent and Giuliani by 45 percent. Other polling in December showed Jay Nixon with 47 percent to Governor Blunt’s 42 percent in part because of Medicaid cuts.  41 percent think the governor is doing a good or excellent job, 32 percent say poor. (Rasmussen Reports)

 

Experience is something you don’t get until just  after you need it

 

Mike Huckabee is a Fiscal Conservative according to Dick Morris who was his political consultant in the early ‘90’s. A recent column by Bob Novak excoriated Huckabee for a 47 percent increase in the state tax burden. But, Morris says, “In Arkansas, the income tax when he took office was 1 percent for the poorest taxpayers and 7 percent for the richest, exactly where it stood when he left office 11 years later. But in the interim, he doubled the standard deduction and the child care credit, repealed the capital gains taxes for home sales, lowered the capital gains rate, expanded the homestead exemption and set up tax free savings accounts for medical care and college tuitions. He did raise the sales tax one cent in 11 years, but only after the courts ordered him to do so. Most impressively, he did pass an income tax surcharge amid a drop in revenues after September 11, 2001 but repealed it three years later when it wasn’t needed. (TownHall.com)  Please note: The acts referred to above were written by the legislature, not the governor and became law by his signature..

 

About Huckabee, George Will Says: “Huckabee broadly repudiates core Republican policies such as free trade, low taxes, the legitimacy of America’s corporate entities and the free market system allocating wealth and opportunity. He represents a wholesale repudiation of what came after the 1970’s…..Reaganism.” Will points out that the New Hampshire chapter of the National Educational Association, an important part of the Democratic Party’s base has endorsed Mike Huckabee. (NewsMax.com)

 

According to Bill Sammon on Fox News, an organization called “Redeem the Vote” with the mission and goal to engage America’s young people in the political process offered their list of Christian Evangelicals to the presidential candidates but Mike Huckabee was the only one to take advantage of the offer.

 

Mike Huckabee’s Evangelical Base has pushed him near the front because there are so many candidates and so little enthusiasm for them. But the Huckabee boom is likely to fade as those charmed by his personality learn more about his policy views. So, if the Huckabee boom fades, who benefits? Most Republicans think Mr. Huckabee would be as bad a president as Jimmy Carter, for essentially the same reasons. So if Huckabee wins Iowa caucuses January 3 by a comfortable margin, there will be a rush to rally around the candidate most likely to stop him. Since Giuliani has been sinking in the polls, that figures to be either Mr. Romney or Senator McCain, whoever wins New Hampshire January 8.…But there is another plausible scenario. Suppose

Huckabee wins narrowly in Iowa with Fred Thompson a close third. And McCain wins narrowly in New Hampshire. Huckabee is still alive but now seems unlikely to be the nominee. Mr. Romney is on life support, but not dead because his defeats were so narrow and his wallet is so big.  Senator McCain is revived but there is no rush to him. And then there is Fred Thompson. He has been written off because his campaign has been so lackluster. But his political obituary may be as premature as Mr. McCain’s. Giuliani is still stuck with his views on abortion and Romney is still a Mormon.  If Mike Huckabee is the hare in this race, Fred Thompson is the tortoise. (From an article by Jack Kelly in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)  On December 26 Rasmussen Reports said Huckabee support among evangelicals had been as high as 62 percent but has dropped to 49 percent.

 

DON’T RAISE TAXES ON THE RICH.  Why not? They can afford it. Yes, they can, but it will hurt the non-rich when you take away incentives for the rich to invest. The non-rich are not the ones who invest in capital goods and business expansion. The non-rich need the jobs created by investments of the rich. So, let the rich remain rich so more of the non-rich will be better off. It’s just that simple. (The editor)

 

He’s Done It Again.  Representative John Shadegg (R-AZ) continues to have the courage to introduce a bill called the Enumerated Powers Act (EPA). HR 1359 is a bill that requires that each Act of the Congress shall contain a concise and definite statement of the Constitutional authority relied upon for the enactment of each portion of that act. His bill is generally ignored as his colleagues pursue legislation creating an ever-growing federal government with powers that abrogate the Constitution they have sworn to uphold. 30 members of the House co-sponsor the bill. Rep. Todd Akin is the only co-sponsor from Missouri. (Chuck Muth’s News & Views)

 

“Wisdom and Cleverness are very different things. My nomination for the three wisest presidents would be Washington, Lincoln and Reagan. For the three cleverest…FDR, Nixon and Clinton. (Thomas Sowell)

 

 

There are two rules to success: 1)  Don’t tell all you know.

 

America Has Never Been a Multicultural Society

The condensation of an article by Michael Medved, published by TownHall.com

 

Belgium hovers on the verge of collapse and dissolution, after a 177 year history of building a vast African empire. It served as a bloody battlefield in two world wars after which it achieved a phenomenally privileged postwar standard of living.

 

The painful inability to form a new government through much of 2007 highlights the desire many, if not most Belgians to divide the country between hostile Flemish and Walloon components. The French speaking Walloons identify most with France. The Flemings prefer to cast their lot with the Netherlands and neither side affirms the synthetic Belgian identity. Many experts predict the ultimate break-up of the nation in the style of 1993’s “Velvet Divorce” that saw the nation of Czechoslovakia divided into the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Like most other experiments in multi-culturalism, the Belgian experience (and don’t forget the break-up of Yugoslavia) of different and disconnected nationalities trying to share the same nation showed the folly of the current trend that alleges diversity as a blessing and a boon.

 

The multi-culturalists love to talk about the United States as a gorgeous, colorful, multi-faceted mosaic, comprised of thousands of different but still distinctive tiles, or a complex tapestry with diverse scenes and styles in which no particular thread manages to predominate. That description arises from irresponsible lies about the origins and history of this nation, distortions that require clarity and direction.

 

1. At the time of the nation’s founding it was unabashedly uni-cultural.  In their book about the Constitutional Convention, “Decision in Philadelphia,” Christopher and James Lincoln Collier provide a vivid portrait of the new nation at the time. “The United States in 1787 was by no means as diverse as the bewildering ethnic crazy quilt it is today. Over 75 percent of the white population was of British and Irish stock. Among whites, 85 percent spoke English as a first language, and although there were some Catholics and Jews, the country was overwhelmingly Protestant.” The only significant white ethnic group beyond the British and Protestant Irish and Scots-Irish was the Germans, representing up to 30 percent of the population in Pennsylvania. The Jewish numbered around 3,000 or one tenth of one percent of the total population.

 

As Michel de Crevecoeur asked, and answered in his 1782 pamphlet  “Letters from an American Farmer;” “What then is the American, this new man? He is neither European nor the descendant of  a European…He is an American, who leaving behind him all his ancient prejudices and manners, received new ones from the new mode of life he has embraced, the new government he obeys and the new rank he holds. He becomes American by being received in the broad lap of our Alma Mater. Here individuals of all nations are melted into a new race of men, whose labors and posterity will one day cause great changes in the world.”

 

2. The Powerful anti-immigration movement of the 1840s and 50s unequivocally demonstrated the nation’s rejection of multi-culturalism.  Far from welcoming the first major wave of dramatically distinctive immigrants and embracing the joys of diversity, the distinctly uni-cultural American people reacted with suspicion and often hostility. In the 1840s, millions of Irish and Germans arrived in the United States with a crucial difference from prior Irish and German citizens: these newcomers were overwhelmingly Catholic (the Germans mostly from Bavaria) and so exacerbated the suspicions of a populace deeply distrustful of anything touching the Vatican. In 1856 Millard Fillmore ran for the White House with a platform that included severe restrictions on future immigration, a ban on all foreign-born citizens in public office of any kind, increasing the waiting period for naturalized citizenship from five to twenty-one years.

 

Two wrongs are only the beginning

 

America Has Never Been a Multicultural Society (Continued )

 

3. The nation’s most prominent leaders always rejected the notion of separate ethnic identities or cultures and the designation of “Hyphenated Americans.”  In a 1915 address to an Irish Catholic audience, former President Theodore Roosevelt made a passionate plea for the ideal of one nation, indivisible: “There is no room in this country for hyphenated Americanism. When I refer to hyphenated Americans, I do not refer to naturalized Americans. Some of the best Americans I have ever known were naturalized Americans. Americans born abroad. The one absolute way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, Italian-Americans, each preserving his separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with people of that nationality, than with other citizens of the American Republic. The only good American is the man who is American and nothing else.”

 

4. Despite the ethnic pride movements of the 60s, the “Melting Pot” has always worked.  In 1908, a melo-dramatic, updated version of the Romeo and Juliet story became a major stage hit and introduced a new term into the national vocabulary. The play “The Melting Pot” by immigrant poet and Zionist activist Israel Zangwill told the story of two lovers from bitterly divergent backgrounds who manage to make a new life together in New York City. The male lead tells his lover: “Understand that America is God’s Crucible, the great melting pot where all races are melting and reforming! A fig for your feuds and vendettas!” This vision touched a deep chord in the nation in 1908 and still has the power to inspire.

 

5.  Even though all immigrant groups contribute to American identity, they haven’t done so in line with their percentage of population.  As previously noted, more Americans today boast Germanic heritage than British heritage, and yet no one could argue that the culture of the United States contains more teutonic than English elements.

 

Despite the insistence of multi-culturalists that no one nationality deserves primacy in terms of contemporary American identity, it is obvious that the earliest settlers from the British Isles played a disproportionate role in shaping the nation. We speak English, embrace British traditions of jurisprudence and politics, even model our great universities on the medieval building of Oxford and Cambridge. America’s British heritage isn’t that it’s “first among equals,” but the obvious standard to which all newcomers have managed to adjust. Yes, various ethnicities eventually melt down in the “crucible” of America, but the resulting molten metal has been poured into forms and molds shaped long ago in England, Scotland and Wales.

 

6. The current “Diversity” of American Life is regularly distorted and overstated. For years, we’ve been subjected to outrageously misleading stories about how “minorities” now constitute an American “majority” and about the implacable decline of the nation’s traditional white, Protestant identity. Obviously, those who pontificate in this tone rarely check the census data. The Census Bureau’s 2005 American Community Survey show that 74.7 percent of us (215.3 million) identify as “white alone,” 12.1 Percent (34.9 milllion) say we are “black American,” 4.3 percent are Asian American and 7.9 percent say “some other race” or “two or more races.” Hispanics are (rightly) not identified as a “race.” The 14.5 percent (41.9 million) who register as Hispanic can count themselves as any race; as it happens 48 percent of them say they are white. At the time of the Constitution 80 percent of the population was white. Today, 75 percent self-identify as white.

 

<>The nation remains overwhelmingly Christian and Protestant. In the 2001 census 79.8 percent of respondents identified themselves as one or another Christian denomination. Only 5.2 percent claimed membership in a non-Christian faith, with Jews (1.4 percent) the leaders of that group. Only 0.6 percent are Muslim, 0.5 percent Buddhist and 0.4 percent Hindu. The most rapidly growing segment in the survey involves those who say they have “no religion” or else identify as “atheist” or “agnostic.” They represent 15 percent of the total.

If you think you can, you can. If you think you can’t, you’re right. (Mary Kay Ash)

 

 

America Has Never Been a Multicultural Society 

 

7. The African American Exception The black community remains the only important sub-group with a long-standing claim to a meaningful separate cultural identity. They are the only segment of the population that didn’t choose to come here, was stigmatized as property and sub-human, and survived centuries of mistreatment through vile and violent bigotry. Blacks developed a distinctive and separate culture because of their enforced separation for hundreds of years. Nevertheless, African Americans made prodigious contributions to the “melting pot” process. What we consider distinctly “American” music evolved largely out of ragtime, blues and jazz which in turn derived from ancient African traditions. Their role in the development of our dominant culture is often unacknowledged. In any event, there has never been any mass support for the idea of carving out an ethnic homeland or repatriation to Mother Africa.

 

With relief and confidence we can follow the various separatist movements in Europe, where true multi-culturalism continues to bear its bitter fruit as we watch the unfolding fate in Belgium of the quarreling Walloons and the Flemish where the beer is stronger than any unifying nationalism.

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

Indoctrination in the Ivory Tower

The condensation of an article by George Will as published in TownHall.com

 

In 1943, the U.S. Supreme Court, affirming the right of Jehovah’s Witnesses children to refuse to pledge allegiance to the U.S. flag in school declared: “No official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion or other matters of opinion, or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.” Today, that principle is routinely violated, coast to coast, by officials who are petty in several senses.

 

They are teachers at public universities, in schools of social work. A study prepared by the National Association of Scholars, a group that combats political correctness on campuses, reviews social work education programs at 10 major public universities and comes to this conclusion: Such programs mandate an ideological orthodoxy to which students must subscribe concerning “social justice” and “oppression.”

 

In 1997, the National Association of Social Workers (NASW) adopted a surreptitious political agenda in the form of a new code of ethics, enjoining social workers to be advocates for social justice from “local to global levels.” A widely used textbook…“Direct Social Work Practice: Theory and Skill”…declares that promoting “social and economic justice” is especially imperative as a response to “the conservative trends of the past three decades.” Clearly, in the social work profession’s catechism, whatever social and economic are, they are in the opposite of conservatism.

 

The Council on Social Work Education (CSWE), the national accreditor of social work educational programs, encourages….not that encouragement is required….the ideological permeation of the curricula, including mandatory student advocacy. The CSWE says students must demonstrate an ability to “understand the forms and mechanism of oppression and discrimination.”

 

At Arizona State University, social work students must “demonstrate compliance with the NASW code of Ethics.” Berkley requires compliance as proof of “suitability for the profession.” Schools’ mission statements, student manuals and course descriptions are clotted with vocabulary of “progressive” cant….”diversity,” “inclusion,” “classism,” “ethnocentrism,” racism,” “sexism,” heterosexism,” “ageism,” “white privilege,” “ableism,” “cultural imperialism,” and on and on. It’s just what the American Association of University Professors warned against in its 1915 “Declaration of Principles.”

 

In 2005, Emily Brooker, a social work student at Missouri State University, was enrolled in a class taught by a professor who advertised himself as a liberal and insisted that social work was a liberal profession. At first a mandatory assignment for his class was to advocate homosexual foster homes and adoption, with all students required to sign an advocacy letter, on university stationery, to the state legislature. 

 

A government big enough to give you everything you want is strong enough to take everything you have. (T. Jefferson)

 

Indoctrination in the Ivory Tower  

 

When Brooks objected on religious grounds, the project was made optional. But before the final exam she was charged with a “Level 3” violation of professional standards. In a hearing she was forbidden from recording, she was ordered to write an explanation how she could lessen the gap between her ethics and those of the social work profession. When she sued the university, charges were dropped and financial restitution was made.

 

Since the NAS study was released, none of the schools covered has contested the findings.

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

A Commentary

By George Carlin following the death of his wife.

 

The paradox of our time in history is that we have taller buildings but shorter tempers, wider freeways, but narrower viewpoints. We spend more, but have less. We buy more, but enjoy less. We have bigger houses yet smaller families. We have more conveniences but less time. We have more degrees but less sense, more knowledge, but less judgment, more experts, yet more problems, more medicine, but less wellness.

 

We drink too much, spend too recklessly, laugh too little, drive too fast, get too angry, stay up too late, get up too tired, read too little, watch TV too much. And we pray too seldom.

 

We’ve learned how to make a living, but not a life. We’ve added years to life but not life to years. We’ve been all the way to the moon and back, but have trouble crossing the street to meet a new neighbor. We’ve conquered outer space but not inner space. We have done larger things, but not better things.

 

We’ve cleaned up the air, but polluted the soul. We’ve conquered the atom, but not our prejudice. We write more, but learn less. We plan more, but accomplish less. We’ve learned to rush, but not to wait. We build  computers that hold more information and to produce more copies than ever. But, we communicate less and less.

 

These are the times of fast foods and slow digestion, big men and small character, steep profits and shallow relationships. These are the days of two incomes but more divorce. We have fancier houses, but broken homes. These are days of quick trips, disposable diapers, throwaway morality, one night stands, overweight bodies and pills that do everything from cheer to quiet, to kill. It is a time when there is much in the showroom window and nothing in the stockroom. It is a time when technology can bring this letter to you, and you can choose to either share this insight, or just hit delete.

 

Remember to spend some time with your loved ones, because they are not going to be around forever.

 

Remember to say a kind word to someone who looks up to you in awe, because that little person will grow up and leave your side.

 

Remember to give a warm hug to the one next to you. That is the only treasure you can give with your heart that doesn’t cost a cent.

 

Remember to say, I love you to your partner and your loved ones, but most of all, mean it. A kiss and embrace will mend hurt when it comes from deep inside of you.

 

Remember to hold hands and cherish the moment for someday that person will not always be there.

 

Give time for love. Give time to speak! Give time to the precious thoughts in your mind.

 

And always remember, life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away.

 

 

Send comments and subscriptions to THE COMMENTARY, PO Box 126, Mountain Grove, MO 65711. Subscriptions by mail are

$10 per year. It is free on line at www.texascountyrepublicans.org or free as an e-mail if requested.  Lee Hutcheson Editor.

The Texas County Commentary is a publication of the Texas County Republican Committee, Kevin McGowen, Chairman

 



  Click here to return to the Texas County Republican Home Page